Protester against trumping should target ‘naive’ USU and AI
“It was so important to come today, because there is such a wide combination of groups. Type [Trump] At each level, it should not be in power, he must not be allowed in front of any TV camera, let alone as a president of the United States, and to visit him here – that I mostly believe – this is simple. Really not included. “
Like other protesters, Sarah quickly referenced the end right in London last Saturday, which attracted over 100,000 people and exposed to deepening divisions within the United Kingdom, as a reason for the protest.
“To give this guy here for our government and our royal family, such a fucking serious mistake,” she says, which describes Trump as a “epithet of hatred and violence.” “We’re angry. We’re all really angry.”
Photo: Natasha Bernal
Clive Teague, which was in protests who supports the creation in the extinction of Waverley and the border in Surrey, says that this AI contract is one of the many things that the government does not work on evil. Trump “is there [in Windsor] Because we’re here. If we weren’t here, he would come to the mall. We’re here to stop him. “
Teague says it is not against the use of AI, as long as it works with new, pure energy sources, not existing powers. “We cannot continue to burn fossil fuels to continue burying in these data centers, as they will be looking for requests for the rest of the world.” This opinion was echoed by other ecological groups, such as Greenpeace, which are subject to huge data centers approved without what it considers that the proper assessment of the impact on local water systems and the electricity network.
“Greenpeace does not oppose AI,” said the main scientist of Greenpeace Great Britain Doug Parr in a written wiring statement. “Multibillion-Pounds-covers should be forced to take on a responsibility for the solution, whether they are cooling a lot of water or running on a new, clean renewable power instead of just a fan for just fans for the AI sector.”